Lisa Henry, a Lake County mother of son with cerebral palsy, was
convicted of murdering him by setting the house on fire.
The jury deliberated for five hours before convicting her on charges of aggravated murder, murder, child endangering and aggravated arson.
Henry's three young grandchildren were also home at the time the fire was set, but survived.
Her defense: Her son died of natural causes, which caused her to go insane and set the house on fire. She pleaded insanity on the arson charges, not guilty on the others.
The prosecution charged that
she doused her son in gasoline, lit the fire, and then tried to kill herself by slashing her own wrists.
Henry contends she went into to check on Michael, aged 24, and he was dead. She then snapped, wrote a suicide note, and set the house on fire. She claimed under oath she did not recall anything from that morning after finding her son dead.
When defense attorney David McGee asked her why she would endanger her 1-, 2- and 3-year-old grandchildren, Henry replied, "I would never hurt my grandchildren intentionally, never. I don't have any recollection of it at all."
Henry said she also doesn't remember leaving a suicide note or calling her husband, John, at work about 9 a.m. that day telling him to come home before it was too late.
"My mind was not right then," she testified.
Her case was not without evidence. An expert at Case Western testified she was insane at the time of the fire and that her amnesia was genuine.
The head of the burn unit at Metro Hospital testified that Michael's lungs upon autopsy do not look like those of a man who died in a fire.
But yet, she set a fire and a man with cerebral palsy who, by reading the accounts in the paper, probably could not have gotten out of the house himself, is dead.
Did she set the fire that killed him?
Did she set the fire to cover up the fact that she killed him?
Did she set the fire, as the prosecution alleges, because she was worried that a family member was going to report her for the condition of her home?
Did she set the fire because she was so distraught over the fact he was dead?
Apparently the jury couldn't get past the fact that she set a fire. Apparently they thought it was more likely that the fire was set intentionally to either commit murder or cover one up, than it was that it was just an irrational act by a distraught mother.
The verdict, and the prosecution in general, is not setting well with the family:
Henry's sister-in-law Pam Dosky and other family members watched in disbelief and wept after the verdict was read.
"Every one of them is corrupt," Dosky said of the investigators and prosecutors. "And there is not a damn thing we can do about it. From Day One they were in my brother's face at the hospital and at the house. How could anyone in their right mind convict that woman? I've never seen such an injustice in my life."
The lawyer in the case, David McGee, said an appeal is planned.
"I have never in my 25 years in the justice system seen a murder conviction on such little evidence," McGee said in the courtroom after the trial ended.